◇ You just rated Karina (aespa) vs Margot Robbie — what's YOUR PSL score?Get rated · $9 →

Karina (aespa) vs Margot Robbie

Who Is More Attractive? · PSL Comparison

◇ Verdict

Margot Robbie mogs Karina (aespa) — PSL 7.2 vs 7.0, a 0.2-point gap. Margot Robbie takes it on positive canthal tilt, while Karina (aespa)'s ceiling is capped by slightly soft jaw.

Karina (aespa)PSL 7.0 · HIGH STACY
Facial Symmetry9.5
Eye Area / Canthal Tilt9.5
Facial Thirds8.5
Cheekbones9.0
Jaw Definition7.5
Skin Quality9.5
▲ Top halo

Karina's canthal tilt is extreme — estimated +6–8°. Creates the sharp, almost alien-beautiful eye quality that defines her aesthetic.

▼ Top failo

Jaw definition below Western Chad-equivalent standard. K-pop typical softer gonial angle.

Full Karina (aespa) analysis →
Margot RobbiePSL 7.2 · HIGH STACY
Facial Symmetry9.0
Eye Area / Canthal Tilt8.5
Facial Thirds9.0
Cheekbones9.0
Jaw Definition8.0
Skin Quality9.0
▲ Top halo

Clear positive canthal tilt — approximately +3–5°. Her outer eye corners sit visibly higher, creating a focused, attractive eye shape.

▼ Top failo

Nasal length is marginally above ideal proportions in some photos. Minor failo most visible in profile shots.

Full Margot Robbie analysis →
◇ Where do you rank?

You just rated two celebrities. Get your own PSL score, tier, and failos.

$9 · 32-vector AI analysis · photo discarded instantly

Run the scan →